Twitter’s 140-Character Limit? Not Such a Big Deal — In Chinese

July 24th, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Here’s a small but revealing example of how communications technologies can work differently once they leave the land of their birth: individual Twitter posts can express more information in Chinese than in English, because the Chinese writing system uses ideograms rather than an alphabet. The difference? Ideograms represent words or concepts with a single character, where alphabetical systems spell them out letter by letter.

Alphabetical systems have a real advantage in some areas. They tend to be easier to learn, since you don’t have to memorize thousands of individual symbols, and they’re definitely easier to type. But since ideogrammatic systems allow for the transmission of rich information in a very small space, they can be a good match for a system like Twitter or SMS text messaging — assuming you have a good interface! If you’re able to enter and view ideograms easily, Twitter’s role as a conversational space can really expand, since its most significant limit in English and similar languages is the fact that you can really only fit so much complex thought into 140 characters. Twitter as a medium for philosophical debate?

I’d never considered this idea until I caught a segment on today’s Morning Edition looking at the role of Twitter in publicizing internal dissent in China, in which the head of a similar Chinese microblogging service mentioned the idea that ideograms can transmit more information in a small space than other writing systems can. Twitter turns out not to have much of a role in China so far, despite some hype in the segment intro, largely because the internet does turn out to have an “off” switch, as we found in Iran. Still, our fascination with cross-cultural communications differences makes me bet that there are more than a few Ph.D. dissertations lurking in the future of the Chinese microblogging connection — and one day, maybe even some free speech.

Update: Alas, not a new idea, as Andrew Leonard picked up over on Salon.com a couple of months ago.

cpd


Robot-Selected "Related" Articles:

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Nouveaux Guides du Petit &hellip  |  August 2nd, 2009 at 5:01 am

    [...] Mais le blog du 10 Downing Street est allé plus loin la semaine dernière en publiant un guide de 20 pages à l’usage de tous les départements du gouvernement britannique. L’auteur justifie la longueur de ce vademecum par le fait que, malgré une barrière à l’entrée très faible en raison de sa simplicité, le micro-blogging doit respecter certaines règles pour être efficace (c’est à dire porter la parole du gouvernement à un maximum de gens) et que les erreurs ne seraient pas pardonnées par les utilisateurs. Et il n’est pas toujours facile de faire passer un message en 140 caractères, sauf bien sûr lorsque l’on écrit chinois. [...]

Help build e.politics

Make a comment, correct my errors, suggest more tools and tactics, leave a case study, or otherwise make this page a better resource.

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Bookmark and Share

SEARCH EPOLITICS.COM


Download Winning in 2010 Download Learning from Obama

Subscribe to e.politics

Enter your address to subscribe via email:


Subscribe via RSS

Follow via Twitter and Facebook

Highlights

Put e.politics on Your Site

Get this widget!

Calendar

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Recent Posts

home about contact colin delany put e.politics to work