Less Than A Month Until Politics Online
February 20th, 2007
Woo ha! It’s less than a month before the annual gathering-of-the-tribe known as the Politics Online Conference, and you’d better be planning to go or you’re really gonna miss out. Last year’s conference gave me the idea to start this e.politics website you’re reading at this very moment; you never know what kind of trouble we might fall into THIS time around. Bonus for 2007: I’m moderating a panel, God help us all. And, though nothing is set in stone, I may have another tasty little surprise for you kids come conference time. All for the low, low price of $495, which I’m sure is just sitting there burning a hole in your pocket.
To whet your appetite, here are more IPDI interviews with prominent online strategists, in this case two folks who happen to be friends of mine. Time to pimp my peeps!
– cpd
Entry Filed under: Announcements, Events
2 Comments Add your own
1. Michael F. Sarabia | April 11th, 2007 at 12:34 am
I worked with Artificial Intelligence 19 years ago. I am very disappointed there are no AI response systems to answer an email, whenever possible, anyone interested on the political views of a candidate. email is the ideal medium to interface with AI with the views of a candidate. There are collections of written papers written by or for the candidates that would provide answers tailored to the exact, or nearly exact, style or mood of the writer. Yahoo, for example has compiled a library of statements of a candidate that can be used by any voter. Google has a marvelous search engine and Wikipedia may have the best, if it is ever implemented as once intended. The author of the email query provides the words and AI avoids giving dumb answers. Stanford and Lockheed Missile and Space Co., Sunnyvale had an excellent staff, but we have all retired. It can be done and it is an ideal fit for AI. Try it, you’d like it! As, they used to say. American Express used AI.
MikeSar
2. Michael F. Sarabia | May 24th, 2007 at 11:22 pm
Bloggers tend to be people of words, thoughts and words, often logical thoughts and words.
But, they ignore that we are fighting AlQuida in Iraq, but ben Laden is in Tora Bora, Northern Pakistan.
They ignore that we have lost 3,400 soldiers and UBL lost less than 34. That we have poured $500 Billion in Iraq and UBL has used, at most, $500,000.
That we have gone in debt for $2 or more Trillion and, probably, UBL would be happy to lend us more money.
That we have lost our raputation and friends in most of the world and we are only prolonging the agony of defeat.
What are we thinking? ARE we thinking?
We seem to follow a plan written by UBL himself!
Help build e.politics
Make a comment, correct my errors, suggest more tools and tactics, leave a case study, or otherwise make this page a better resource.
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed