Archive for November 7th, 2007

Is No One Reading Giuliani’s Blog?

Cross-posted on techPresident

Continuing today’s exciting news from the Republican side of our little presidential campaign, Bruce Reed notes in Slate that Rudy Giuliani’s official blog seems to be acting in sympathy with Hollywood writers — except that instead of the writers striking, it’s the readers.

Rudy’s staff has added a “how many views has this piece received” feature to the blog, and my advice to them would be to start clicking on the articles like crazy, ’cause it sure doesn’t look as though anyone else is. Reed’s happy to point out that the November 1st “Hizzoner’s Highlights” seems to have been read 37 times, though several posts have reader counts in the hundreds.

Actually, a little experimentation shows that the “views” number reflects how many times the LINK that each article title points to has been clicked on, which is a totally different number than how many times the article itself has been read. In fact, all the blog posts seem to sit on the page in their entirety, and so an accurate reader count per article would be impossible unless you’re tracking actual eyeball motions.

What a strange way to run a blog all around — normally, an article title links to a standalone version of the post, not to some outside piece. The way the Guiliani site is set up, I don’t see how you can link to a particular article, leave a comment or trackback, or do just about anything else you expect to be able to do on a normal blog. It’s as though they decided to create a blog-like piece of communications technology without the actual blog features. The only piece of reader interaction? That click-counter, whose sole effect is to make it look as though the site is essentially unread. Nice, um, job.

cpd

Add comment November 7th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Mr. Romney, Meet Gay.com

Finally, someone on the Republican side (other than Ron Paul) is exploring new ground online: a great article in the today’s Times looks at how some Mitt Romney online display ads showed up on sites that the campaign didn’t exactly plan for, including Gay.com. Big tent indeed! Apparently, Advertising.com’s content filters didn’t work quite as planned, allowing the ads to end up on sites that the Romney campaign would have preferred to avoid. This brief bout of lifestyle experimentation doesn’t seem to be scaring them away from online advertising networks, though, according to Facebook-friend-of-e.politics Mindy Finn:

Mr. Romney’s campaign said the Gay.com spot had been placed in spite of a request to keep its ads off dating and alternative lifestyle sites, a request that may have been lost in communication with Advertising.com. (Aides said they also asked that Romney ads be kept off Web pages with pornographic images, gambling or left-leaning political content.)

Ms. Finn said the Romney campaign was becoming more careful, sticking to more artfully chosen “subnetworks” within the Advertising.com system.

“We have learned,” she said. “It provides a danger, but there is also incredible opportunity.”

C’mon, Mitt! There’s a potential Romney ARMY waiting in the ranks of gay porn aficionados (I’d make a niche-audience joke, but that might be considered in bad taste). Thanks to Alicia LaPorte for the tip, though she’s probably regretting it now.

cpd

2 comments November 7th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us




Video

The Latest: Sarah Burris has a beer with e.politics

More e.politics video

Subscribe to e.politics

Enter your address to subscribe via email:


Subscribe via RSS

Follow via Twitter and Facebook

Put e.politics on Your Site

Get this widget!

Highlights

Links

Calendar

November 2007
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category

home about contact colin delany put e.politics to work