Posts filed under 'Scandal'

Quick Hits — May 13, 2008

cpd

Add comment May 13th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Newsweek: Election ‘08 will be “Swift Boat Times Five”

Newsweek’s current story on the Obama campaign’s internal dynamics contains this warning (via Mike Allen) for anyone who values civility and honesty in politics:

Another McCain adviser, who asked for anonymity discussing internal campaign strategy, bluntly warned: “It’s going to be Swift Boat times five on both sides — The candidates will both do their best publicly to mute it. But in a close race, I don’t see how to shut that down.”

For all of our sakes, let’s hope that some kind of rationality survives. No doubt much of the smearing will happen online, in websites, videos and the kind of behind-the-scenes emails that have already dogged “Manchurian Muslim” Obama. Bloggers will both help AND hurt, helping by researching and puncturing lies, hurting by spreading them. Ultimately, though, the onus is on mainstream journalists to try to separate truth from fiction. Print and online reporters have a far better record on this front so far this year; cable news has been a hellhole of unrepentant rumormongering and idle speculation. Don’t we deserve better?

cpd

Add comment May 11th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Quick Hits — April 28, 2008

cpd

Add comment April 28th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Lawrence Lessig and an Online Singing Jesus Cause Scandal on RedState and Limbaugh

Wired’s Sarah Lai Stirland picked up on a revealing micro-scandal a couple of days ago: Obama supporter Lawrence Lessig has been getting beaten up on Redstate.com and Rush Limbaugh’s radio show over a video he’s used as a mashup example in presentations. The crime? The clip depicts a somewhat swishy Jesus singing “I Will Survive” before a dramatic run-in with a bus proves otherwise (note that the RedState author immediately jumps to the conclusion that this Jesus is gay — musical numbers are always a dead giveaway).

(more…)

Add comment April 28th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Quick Hits — March 6, 2008

Post-Politics Online/pre-SXSW Quick Hits extravaganza.

cpd

Add comment March 6th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Quick Hits — February 25, 2008

cpd

Add comment February 25th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Obama on His Secret Muslim Plot to Take Over America and Other Internet Rumors

From the Nevada debate: “In the internet age, there are going to be lies that are spread all over the place. I have been victimized by these lies. Fortunately, the American people are, I think, smarter than folks give them credit for.”

More on dirty politicking and internet rumors on Wednesday.

cpd

Add comment January 16th, 2008 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Email Dirty Tricks Fallout: Ron Paul Spammer Fingered, Clinton Staffer Fired

A couple of interesting scandal-related stories today: first off, as Wired and others are reporting, some excellent research by an expert with the company SecureWorks has found the spammer behind the recent barrage of unsolicited Ron Paul emails. Still unknown: who hired him.

Stewart’s detective work identified the botnet as part of a criminal operation in Eastern Europe called Reactor Mailer that offers spammers a convenient web interface to manage their illegal campaigns. The Ron Paul spam was managed by a spammer-for-hire who goes by the handle “nenastnyj.”

The political messaging was a departure for nenastnyj, and for the Reactor Mailer network, which is normally hired out by scammers offering fake watches, work at home opportunity and male enlargement products.

Was an over-eager supporter footing the bill? Or was someone managing a convoluted scheme to discredit Paul? Next, on to the Democratic side of the race, where a Hillary Clinton county chair in Iowa has lost her volunteer job for forwarding around an email accusing Obama of being a Muslim manchurian candidate bent on fomenting an Islamic revolt in the U.S. Thanks to Salon for the tip.

cpd

Add comment December 6th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Obama’s Novak-Driven Pre-Emptive Strike on Hillary and the Blinding Speed of Modern Politics

Just got a “breaking news” alert from The Politico that Barack Obama has accused the Clinton campaign of engaging in “the old ‘Swift boat’ politics,” using as evidence a Bob Novak piece from earlier today that claimed that Clinton was holding scandalous material on the Illinois senator, refusing to use it in public, but spreading rumors about it behind the scenes. The Novak article ran in Human Events rather than in the columnist’s high-profile perch at the Post, but it spread widely over the Web, no doubt in part because it appeared on Drudge. Obama’s statement is quite strongly worded, as is the Clinton campaign’s response (delivered by email), which basically accuses Barack of being such a callow youth that he’ll fall for an obvious Republican dirty trick.

Regardless of where the truth lies, and it’s going to be interesting as hell finding out, what jumps out at me is the sheer speed of this transaction, particularly for a Saturday. Those of us in the online advocacy community often talk about using this tool and that tool to help mold opinions or win votes, but what I wrote after last year’s mid-term election still stands: the most important effect of the Internet on politics comes from the unfathomable volume of information now available and the speed with which it can spread. The existence of electronic networks has utterly transformed all forms of communications to the extent that we hardly notice it anymore, and the aggregate effect of all of our actions online far outweighs their sum alone. All of which is another way to say, damn, that was fast.

cpd

1 comment November 17th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Thompson and Romney Mix It Up Over PhonyFred.org, RNC Goes for Blood (and Treasure) Over MoveOn Ad

Online politics has turned nasty, vicious, ugly, brutish AND short…just the way we like it. First off, there’s the throwdown between the Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney over the PhonyFred.org website, which Josh Levy wraps up ably at tPrez. Lots of twists in this one, no doubt with more to come; we get to sit back and watch the fun.

Next, some online fallout over MoveOn’s “General Petraeus or General Betray Us” ad in the NY Times, as the GOP sends out a fundraising email with MoveOn as the hook (apparently, MoveOn is part of some overarching liberal conspiracy — my cabal membership card must have been lost in the mail). Fascinating: a political party founded in the 19th century is using an email list to raise money over the Internet based on a newspaper print ad purchased by a political organization that was founded ten years ago in part as an email list…the mind boggles.

cpd

Add comment September 12th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Quick Hits — August 29, 2007

cpd

1 comment August 29th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Larry Craig and the Right-Wing Blogosphere

Writing in Salon, Glenn Greenwald hits on an aspect of the Larry Craig story that ought to raise questions about the intellectual honesty of certain segments of the right-wing blogworld — the vast disparity between many authors’ comments 10 months ago and today. Shortly before last Fall’s mid-term elections, the first stories of Craigs’ (then-) alleged men’s room encounters surfaced on Mike Roger’s site, and many on the right jumped on the rumors as a clear example of left-wing perfidy, with some even claiming that a backlash would swing the election their way. Many questioned the very idea of bringing up a candidate’s sexuality: as Greenwald puts it, “the same political movement that impeached Bill Clinton and which has made a living exploiting issues of private morality for political gain insisted that Rogers had reached a new and despicable low in politics even by reporting this.”

Now that the election’s safely behind us? They can’t run away from Craig’s “despicable” behavior fast enough. Greenwald collects a damning array of then-and-now quotes from a number of stars of the conservative blogosphere, which sure as hell ought to raise questions among these sites’ readers about basic trustworthiness. Talk radio hosts and TV pundits too often blather on in a self-contradictory frenzy, but they can usually get away with it because catching them requires someone to go to lengths to gather and post the audio or video files or the transcripts (thank you, Media Matters). Bloggers’ words, though, are painfully easy to track down via Google or a site’s own search feature, and there’s no hiding from what you’ve written.

Now, being wrong is normal and honorable — it’s a natural consequence of having opinions and being willing to state them in public, and as long as you own up to your errors, your audience will generally understand. Senator Craig’s journey from paragon to villain in many bloggers’ eyes seems like a different story entirely: from here, it looks flat-out dishonest.

cpd

Add comment August 28th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

When Bloggers Go Bad

Wow, here’s a wild one to end the week with:

The California National Guard has placed on leave the personal assistant to its top general and started an investigation after questions were raised about a Web site he maintains that advocates mass violence.

“I, honestly, would like nothing more than to assist in the wholesale slaughter of every idiot on the face of the planet,” Senior Airman Travis Gruber, of Sacramento, Calif., writes on the site, HowToKillPeople.com. In other postings and in a related blog, Gruber denigrates African Americans, Jews, Asians, women, gays and people with physical disabilities.

Oof! I’m a free speech purist, believing that the best form of censorship is your own good judgment. This guy clearly lacks the slightest shred — a National Guard general is a government official, and our blogger here is in essentially the same position as a political staffer. I’d obviously rather not have someone in any position of influence or authority having thoughts like these in his head, but you can’t court-martial a man for thinking. It’s ten times crazier to actually print this in public:

Gruber blogged that when ordered to drive “the big guy” to Oakland this year, he loaded a shotgun with extra shells and filled a pistol “to the brim with hollow-point” bullets because he feared entering the city unarmed.

In a separate posting, he wrote of a woman who once approached him with a question as he waited for Wade at the state Capitol and that he later regretted not “crushing her windpipe” and slamming his car door into her legs for bothering him.

How can you write this stuff online and not expect it to be traced back to you eventually? Here’s the site; all the content except for a brief statement has been removed. Thanks to the Wayback Machine, though, we can read Gruber’s bio and sample some of his collected wit and wisdom. Note to prospective writers who want to keep their jobs, reputations and body parts intact: you probably don’t want to adopt this guy as a role model. Thanks to Burt Edwards for passing the article along.

cpd

Add comment August 24th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

“Gotcha” Culture, Authenticity, and the Danger for Campaigns

As Joe Trippi has been making the rounds lately, one thing he’s been talking about is the rise of a culture of authenticity in politics as we move from a broadcast television era to an Internet-dominated era. I heard him make the point at last week’s Connecting with Young Voters event (ably summarized by Kate Phillips in The Caucus), and he said something similar this week to The Guardian (thanks, Josh).

“Before TV, what mattered was how your voice sounded. Then with TV it matters what your candidate looks like … Anybody can fake it on TV: all the Joe Trippis and Alastair Campbells get really good at making sure our guy looks great for the eight seconds that are actually going on the news.

“We are now moving to a medium where authenticity is king, from what things look like to what’s real … You have to be ‘on’ 24 hours a day, seven days a week.”

(more…)

1 comment June 13th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Facebook: Playing Favorites with Obama?

Josh Levy raised some serious questions yesterday in a techPresident piece about Obama’s preferred treatment in the launch of Facebook’s new Platform application, which lets users build tools for the Facebook community:

But when Platform launched, Obama was the only candidate with an application. Why didn’t John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Ron Paul, or anyone else get in on the possibility of reaching 20 million or more Facebook users and potential voters?

The other campaigns found out about Platform with the rest of us, on Friday, May 25. If Facebook let the Obama campaign in but kept all of the other campaigns out, this was a serious breach of trust.

Serious breach of trust, or maybe even an FEC violation? This is the first election cycle in which campaigns are depending on such a huge variety of Internet companies for exposure: YouTube, Google, MySpace, Facebook, Meetup, Eventful, etc etc. These corporations have a tremendous social responsibility, and if they don’t live up to it, they may face some real consequences — and not just in the court of public opinion.

cpd

1 comment June 5th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Quick Hits — May 22, 2007

Quick Hits is a harsh mistress, but I can ignore her no longer. Special Edition! When the bizarre meets the sublime, plus some scary stuff.

cpd

Add comment May 22nd, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

The Drudge-Industrial Complex: Using the Internet to Spread Political Dirt and Distraction

Michael Scherer has an excellent article in Salon today on a significant way that the Internet is altering the pace and direction of political campaigns, while also subtly changing the role of political journalists, not for the better. To boil it down, the growth of blogs and alternative journalistic outlets (Drudge Report, etc.) has given political opposition researchers a huge number of new avenues to distribute dirt or distracting information about a rival while still maintaining their own anonymity. In the process, political reporters risk losing their investigative role in favor of being channels for stories that campaigns are driving behind the scenes. Some excerpts:

Though reporters, and blogs like the Drudge Report, take credit for scoops, the news of the day is more often than not produced by the invisible hand of one campaign or another.

(more…)

Add comment May 14th, 2007 Trackback Bookmark on del.icio.us

Previous Posts




Put e.politics on Your Site

Get this widget!

Subscribe to e.politics

Enter your address to subscribe via email:


Subscribe via RSS

Follow via Twitter and Facebook

Highlights

Links

Categories

About Colin Delany

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category

home about contact colin delany put e.politics to work