<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter is NOT a Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Winning in 2010: Putting the Pieces Together</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-701739</link>
		<dc:creator>e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Winning in 2010: Putting the Pieces Together</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-701739</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Social Media for Elected Officials</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-664176</link>
		<dc:creator>e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Social Media for Elected Officials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-664176</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web survey</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-631379</link>
		<dc:creator>web survey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-631379</guid>
		<description>Anytime a new social media outlet becomes available, everyone feels they need to get on it so they are staying up to date.  I agree that one should evaluate why they want to join the latest social media product before putting in the time and energy.  Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime a new social media outlet becomes available, everyone feels they need to get on it so they are staying up to date.  I agree that one should evaluate why they want to join the latest social media product before putting in the time and energy.  Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Twitter Op-Ed Published on the McClatchy Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-628573</link>
		<dc:creator>e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Twitter Op-Ed Published on the McClatchy Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-628573</guid>
		<description>[...] think I&#8217;d have learned my lesson after the last couple of Twitter frenzies, but what the heck &#8212; let&#8217;s dive right back into those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think I&#8217;d have learned my lesson after the last couple of Twitter frenzies, but what the heck &#8212; let&#8217;s dive right back into those [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter as a tool for activism</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-618100</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter as a tool for activism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-618100</guid>
		<description>[...] And seasoned practitioners are debating whether a particular social media tool is in and of itself a strategy.   And, while it may be an argument about semantics, it further illustrates this tension. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And seasoned practitioners are debating whether a particular social media tool is in and of itself a strategy.   And, while it may be an argument about semantics, it further illustrates this tension. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-613416</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-613416</guid>
		<description>Great piece! I agree with you about the strategy focus comes first, then tools.  But, there is a tension that happens between these two points -- because there comes a time where you need to get your hands on the tools to figure out what it can do or can&#039;t do for your situation.  There lies the importance of thoughtful experiments.

http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2009/04/twitter-for-activism-tool-vs-strategy-debate-and-a-new-twitter-activism-guide.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece! I agree with you about the strategy focus comes first, then tools.  But, there is a tension that happens between these two points &#8212; because there comes a time where you need to get your hands on the tools to figure out what it can do or can&#8217;t do for your situation.  There lies the importance of thoughtful experiments.</p>
<p><a href="http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2009/04/twitter-for-activism-tool-vs-strategy-debate-and-a-new-twitter-activism-guide.html" rel="nofollow">http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2009/04/twitter-for-activism-tool-vs-strategy-debate-and-a-new-twitter-activism-guide.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Street Cafe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter a Strategy? Like, Come On!</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-605798</link>
		<dc:creator>K Street Cafe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter a Strategy? Like, Come On!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-605798</guid>
		<description>[...] Colin&#8217;s response to Jon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Colin&#8217;s response to Jon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. DigiPol &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter a Strategy? Like, Come On!</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-605791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. DigiPol &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Twitter a Strategy? Like, Come On!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-605791</guid>
		<description>[...] Colin&#8217;s response to Jon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Colin&#8217;s response to Jon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Strategy or Tool? On the Metaphysics of Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-605767</link>
		<dc:creator>e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Strategy or Tool? On the Metaphysics of Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-605767</guid>
		<description>[...] get all crazy over their Twitter. Jon Pincus started the conversation yesterday with a reply to the Twitter-is-not-a-strategy e.politics piece from last week: he contends that Twitter IS a strategy, and he goes to some lengths to imply that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get all crazy over their Twitter. Jon Pincus started the conversation yesterday with a reply to the Twitter-is-not-a-strategy e.politics piece from last week: he contends that Twitter IS a strategy, and he goes to some lengths to imply that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Feed &#187; Twitter is a Tool, Not a Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-605697</link>
		<dc:creator>The Feed &#187; Twitter is a Tool, Not a Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-605697</guid>
		<description>[...] Colin Delaney and Jon Pincus are going back and forth on whether or not Twitter, in itself, is a strategy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Colin Delaney and Jon Pincus are going back and forth on whether or not Twitter, in itself, is a strategy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-605169</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-605169</guid>
		<description>I think that there is just a semantic difference here -- I don&#039;t see what Jon Pincus (in the trackback above) and Colin are saying as being that diametrically opposed.  Twitter is one of a number of communications and engagement channels that can be used.  Sometimes it&#039;s the best one; sometimes it&#039;s not.  I read what Colin is saying to mean that if you use Twitter, you should know why you&#039;re using it and how to use it effectively, and not just because it&#039;s cool or the latest thing.

For example, I&#039;m a pretty avid personal user of Twitter, and I understand and have participated in several types of usage, whether it&#039;s livetweeting a conference, reporting or commenting on something live while it&#039;s still happening, participating in a Twitter chat, spreading the word on a campaign, and sharing mundane and probably not-so-interesting details about my personal life.

I&#039;ve held off on using it as a tool for my nonprofit organization, yet (that&#039;s about to change) because: a) most of my audience isn&#039;t on Twitter and doesn&#039;t get it; b) due to limited staffing, I&#039;ve found it difficult to keep up with on a regular basis; and c) I haven&#039;t had a real goal in mind -- something I wanted to accomplish by using it.  And I think that&#039;s what Colin is talking about -- using it under these conditions might not be the best use of my limited time and resources. 

So adding a user name to GoFollow and adding a button to my website indicating that we&#039;re on Twitter might make us look cool, but doesn&#039;t really accomplish that much.  But I&#039;m on the path to solving a-c above, and so you will see us on Twitter soon, as the result of strategic thought -- not jumping on the bandwagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there is just a semantic difference here &#8212; I don&#8217;t see what Jon Pincus (in the trackback above) and Colin are saying as being that diametrically opposed.  Twitter is one of a number of communications and engagement channels that can be used.  Sometimes it&#8217;s the best one; sometimes it&#8217;s not.  I read what Colin is saying to mean that if you use Twitter, you should know why you&#8217;re using it and how to use it effectively, and not just because it&#8217;s cool or the latest thing.</p>
<p>For example, I&#8217;m a pretty avid personal user of Twitter, and I understand and have participated in several types of usage, whether it&#8217;s livetweeting a conference, reporting or commenting on something live while it&#8217;s still happening, participating in a Twitter chat, spreading the word on a campaign, and sharing mundane and probably not-so-interesting details about my personal life.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve held off on using it as a tool for my nonprofit organization, yet (that&#8217;s about to change) because: a) most of my audience isn&#8217;t on Twitter and doesn&#8217;t get it; b) due to limited staffing, I&#8217;ve found it difficult to keep up with on a regular basis; and c) I haven&#8217;t had a real goal in mind &#8212; something I wanted to accomplish by using it.  And I think that&#8217;s what Colin is talking about &#8212; using it under these conditions might not be the best use of my limited time and resources. </p>
<p>So adding a user name to GoFollow and adding a button to my website indicating that we&#8217;re on Twitter might make us look cool, but doesn&#8217;t really accomplish that much.  But I&#8217;m on the path to solving a-c above, and so you will see us on Twitter soon, as the result of strategic thought &#8212; not jumping on the bandwagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter *is* a strategy (DRAFT) &#171; Liminal states</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-604862</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter *is* a strategy (DRAFT) &#171; Liminal states</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-604862</guid>
		<description>[...] Colin Delany in Twitter is not a strategy on e.Politics and techPresident   Yeap - Twitter is NOT a Strategy &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Colin Delany in Twitter is not a strategy on e.Politics and techPresident   Yeap &#8211; Twitter is NOT a Strategy | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-604046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-604046</guid>
		<description>CPD -

I completely agree with your point that Twitter itself is not a strategy.  I think that the same can be argued for all new and social media tools, that in and of themselves they do not constitute a solid approach to communicating.

Actually, I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citycastmedia.com/mediabackpage/2009/03/despite-tools-its-about-the-story/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a similar piece yesterday on The MediaBackpage&lt;/a&gt; where I discussed the need for communicators to take a more holistic approach that utilizes these types of tactics to tell their stories.



Best,

Jason Cohen
CityCast Media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPD -</p>
<p>I completely agree with your point that Twitter itself is not a strategy.  I think that the same can be argued for all new and social media tools, that in and of themselves they do not constitute a solid approach to communicating.</p>
<p>Actually, I wrote <a href="http://www.citycastmedia.com/mediabackpage/2009/03/despite-tools-its-about-the-story/" rel="nofollow">a similar piece yesterday on The MediaBackpage</a> where I discussed the need for communicators to take a more holistic approach that utilizes these types of tactics to tell their stories.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Jason Cohen<br />
CityCast Media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nisha</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-599408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-599408</guid>
		<description>I totally agree -- Twitter, or blogging or any social media for that matter -- has to have a goal. Using social media just for the sake of innovation or because the &quot;cool kids&quot; are doing it isn&#039;t effective. It needs to have clear aims and goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree &#8212; Twitter, or blogging or any social media for that matter &#8212; has to have a goal. Using social media just for the sake of innovation or because the &#8220;cool kids&#8221; are doing it isn&#8217;t effective. It needs to have clear aims and goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Good Geek Links For You : Wesley Donehue &#124; Political Campaigns &#38; Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/26/twitter-is-not-a-strategy/#comment-598765</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Good Geek Links For You : Wesley Donehue &#124; Political Campaigns &#38; Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=1799#comment-598765</guid>
		<description>[...] e.politics: Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e.politics: Twitter is NOT a Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

