<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Social Networks in Politics: Promise, Frustration and&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/27/online-social-networks-in-politics-promise-frustration-and/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/27/online-social-networks-in-politics-promise-frustration-and/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cpd</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/27/online-social-networks-in-politics-promise-frustration-and/#comment-395947</link>
		<dc:creator>cpd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=894#comment-395947</guid>
		<description>You make a great point, Ed -- we tend to think about these tools in isolation, but it's the combination that matters.  Integration is key! (See &lt;a href="http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/five-simple-rules-for-online-politics/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Rule #3&lt;/a&gt;)

It's probably hard to separate out the exact effects of each of the different channels from the outside, since when a campaign is communicating via soc net site, whether to promote a video, a fundraising drive or just the message of the day, the staff is also almost certainly also sending out related emails to their list (perhaps several times more emails, too, and with targeted messages). 

It'd be fascinating to get internal numbers to measure how the results compare among promotional tools like email, sms and soc nets.  In any case, a campaign like Obama's has the resources to reach people by whatever channel the supporter chooses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great point, Ed &#8212; we tend to think about these tools in isolation, but it&#8217;s the combination that matters.  Integration is key! (See <a href="http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/five-simple-rules-for-online-politics/" rel="nofollow">Rule #3</a>)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably hard to separate out the exact effects of each of the different channels from the outside, since when a campaign is communicating via soc net site, whether to promote a video, a fundraising drive or just the message of the day, the staff is also almost certainly also sending out related emails to their list (perhaps several times more emails, too, and with targeted messages). </p>
<p>It&#8217;d be fascinating to get internal numbers to measure how the results compare among promotional tools like email, sms and soc nets.  In any case, a campaign like Obama&#8217;s has the resources to reach people by whatever channel the supporter chooses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/27/online-social-networks-in-politics-promise-frustration-and/#comment-395942</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=894#comment-395942</guid>
		<description>Online video is very powerful stuff, but don't overlook the value social networks have in spreading those videos around. They're often embedded into Facebook, Myspace, blogs, or Twittered about if they're particularly newsworthy well before they make the jump to the mainstream press. In face, it may be social networks that act as the catalyst for videos that change campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online video is very powerful stuff, but don&#8217;t overlook the value social networks have in spreading those videos around. They&#8217;re often embedded into Facebook, Myspace, blogs, or Twittered about if they&#8217;re particularly newsworthy well before they make the jump to the mainstream press. In face, it may be social networks that act as the catalyst for videos that change campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek Links - 08.27.08 : Wesley Donehue</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/27/online-social-networks-in-politics-promise-frustration-and/#comment-395587</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Links - 08.27.08 : Wesley Donehue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=894#comment-395587</guid>
		<description>[...] e.politics &#124; Online Social Networks in Politics: Promise, Frustration and&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e.politics | Online Social Networks in Politics: Promise, Frustration and&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
