<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unsolicited Advice for Barack Obama: Use &#8220;We&#8221; Instead of &#8220;I&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/04/unsolicited-advice-for-barack-obama-use-we-instead-of-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/04/unsolicited-advice-for-barack-obama-use-we-instead-of-i/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ES NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/04/unsolicited-advice-for-barack-obama-use-we-instead-of-i/#comment-424286</link>
		<dc:creator>ES NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=771#comment-424286</guid>
		<description>I've noticed it a while back and contacted the campaign to point the efficiency of a "We" instead of the "I" , i have never received any feedback on it nor obviously has it been applied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed it a while back and contacted the campaign to point the efficiency of a &#8220;We&#8221; instead of the &#8220;I&#8221; , i have never received any feedback on it nor obviously has it been applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/08/04/unsolicited-advice-for-barack-obama-use-we-instead-of-i/#comment-373248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/?p=771#comment-373248</guid>
		<description>Another reason for "we" is his stated aim to increase citizen involvement with governance via the application of Internet technology. In that case, "we" really is him and his audience, since his audience can, in effect, be part of his team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason for &#8220;we&#8221; is his stated aim to increase citizen involvement with governance via the application of Internet technology. In that case, &#8220;we&#8221; really is him and his audience, since his audience can, in effect, be part of his team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
