<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Facebook Jumped the Shark as a Political Tool?</title>
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Comment Challenge Day 8: Comment on a Blog Outside of Your Core Niche &#171; (No Longer) Alone in a Library</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-297532</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-297532</guid>
					<description>[...] came across a blog  post and I can&amp;#8217;t even remember how I got there.  The blog is called e-politics which places outside of my usual blog reading in the edublogosphere.  However, one of my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] came across a blog  post and I can&#8217;t even remember how I got there.  The blog is called e-politics which places outside of my usual blog reading in the edublogosphere.  However, one of my [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kamccollum</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-297509</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-297509</guid>
					<description>One of the problems with using Facebook as an advocacy tool is the grassroots nature of the tool.  For example, I am an alumna of Teach for America.  When I received an alumni newsletter asking alumni to advertise for TFA by joining a TFA Facebook group, I dutifully logged in to join the group.  However, I found not one official  TFA group but what seemed like hundreds of groups created by TFA corps members and alumni all over the country.  I certainly wasn't going to join all of them and I had no easy way of comparing them to see which would be the best investment of my time.  

One might think that having many voices carrying the same message would make the message louder, but to me, it seems that without a conductor, the message gets lost in the cacophony of the voices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with using Facebook as an advocacy tool is the grassroots nature of the tool.  For example, I am an alumna of Teach for America.  When I received an alumni newsletter asking alumni to advertise for TFA by joining a TFA Facebook group, I dutifully logged in to join the group.  However, I found not one official  TFA group but what seemed like hundreds of groups created by TFA corps members and alumni all over the country.  I certainly wasn&#8217;t going to join all of them and I had no easy way of comparing them to see which would be the best investment of my time.  </p>
<p>One might think that having many voices carrying the same message would make the message louder, but to me, it seems that without a conductor, the message gets lost in the cacophony of the voices.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Is Facebook Really &#8220;All That&#8221;? &#171; Alex Kellner</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-293573</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-293573</guid>
					<description>[...] Colin Delaney at e.politics also uses the &amp;#8220;jump the shark&amp;#8221; metaphor to describe Facebook&amp;#8217;s role in online advocacy: We’ve now seen more than a year of intense use of social networking sites by the U.S. presidential campaigns (and even longer use by issue-advocacy groups), which gives us a solid base of information and experience to judge just how effective Facebook is as a political tool — both for organized political campaigns and advocacy groups and for individual political activists. The verdict? Facebook has not lived up to a lot of its initial political hype, and for reasons that are perfectly natural considering what kind of a site it is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Colin Delaney at e.politics also uses the &#8220;jump the shark&#8221; metaphor to describe Facebook&#8217;s role in online advocacy: We’ve now seen more than a year of intense use of social networking sites by the U.S. presidential campaigns (and even longer use by issue-advocacy groups), which gives us a solid base of information and experience to judge just how effective Facebook is as a political tool — both for organized political campaigns and advocacy groups and for individual political activists. The verdict? Facebook has not lived up to a lot of its initial political hype, and for reasons that are perfectly natural considering what kind of a site it is. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: links for 2008-05-05 &#171; Kevin Bondelli&#8217;s YD Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-292079</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-292079</guid>
					<description>[...] e.politics: online advocacy tools &amp;#38; tactics » Has Facebook Jumped the Shark as a Political Tool... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] e.politics: online advocacy tools &amp; tactics » Has Facebook Jumped the Shark as a Political Tool&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-291898</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-291898</guid>
					<description>Good post Colin.
It so happens that I made a presentation a few days ago to a group of young political leaders (from across Europe mainly) about online politics. I sorta glossed over Facebook in my presentation for some of the reasons you mention: it's a neat tool, but hasn't proven effective at raising a dime or getting a vote.

However, during the Q&amp;#38;A session, one person helped me put things in perspective, in the most humbling manner. That person is a member of the Parliament in Lebanon. 
Because of political threats on his life and that of his family, he's been forced to live in highly secure locations, with bodyguards 24/7. And because he can no longer go out and meet with his constituents, he's resorted to use Facebook to keep in touch with them, to exchange ideas, and to prepare for next year's election. I don't know if it'll be efficient or not, but it was very humbling, to realize once again what it means, in countries where the rule of law and freedom of expression are jeopardized, to be able to get through to people and fight for democracy. By that point, I didn't care how many applications he had installed or whether he had the biggest friends' wheel. I was just he was able to communicate with the outside world, and if Facebook is a better spot than MySpace in Lebanon to reach out to young voters talk about democracy, and perhaps fight radicals, so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Colin.<br />
It so happens that I made a presentation a few days ago to a group of young political leaders (from across Europe mainly) about online politics. I sorta glossed over Facebook in my presentation for some of the reasons you mention: it&#8217;s a neat tool, but hasn&#8217;t proven effective at raising a dime or getting a vote.</p>
<p>However, during the Q&amp;A session, one person helped me put things in perspective, in the most humbling manner. That person is a member of the Parliament in Lebanon.<br />
Because of political threats on his life and that of his family, he&#8217;s been forced to live in highly secure locations, with bodyguards 24/7. And because he can no longer go out and meet with his constituents, he&#8217;s resorted to use Facebook to keep in touch with them, to exchange ideas, and to prepare for next year&#8217;s election. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;ll be efficient or not, but it was very humbling, to realize once again what it means, in countries where the rule of law and freedom of expression are jeopardized, to be able to get through to people and fight for democracy. By that point, I didn&#8217;t care how many applications he had installed or whether he had the biggest friends&#8217; wheel. I was just he was able to communicate with the outside world, and if Facebook is a better spot than MySpace in Lebanon to reach out to young voters talk about democracy, and perhaps fight radicals, so be it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Javaun Moradi</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-291227</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-291227</guid>
					<description>Excellent post Colin. I think you make some terrific points. In addition clutter and increased competition, the demographic shift has done a lot to temper advocacy in Facebook.

As you indicated, Facebook is an increasingly congested and competitive space. For some users, the novelty of adding more causes or fan applications is over, and even the first movers are suffering a lack of stickiness. Creating buzz is a lot easier that creating regular participation.

There has also been a big demographic shift since FB flung open its doors. The average user is older (about 30) and as a whole the environment is less fertile for advocacy. The first class of Facebook users graduated college and expanded their friend-base to include older individuals. Their online Facebook experience now mirrors their offline one -- they've left the student-only groups and integrated with society at large.

As important as advocacy is to many Facebook users, that's not the primary reason that most use the service. While the promise of Facebook is far deeper engagement, it requires even more nurturing than the 1-way channels of DM or email, and this is harder to do in a crowded, older (possibly more apathetic) arena.

Most of the work (and most of the donations) in any organization come from a very, very small percentage of the total body. If you can find those people on Facebook, they're lieutenants that can help you build an active community.

As far as Facebook's overall health, it's taken some hits but I still believe it's as strong as ever -- at the very least there is no better alternative for mass adoption (OpenSocial may change that). The original users still complain about clutter, but many do enjoy using the tool to connect with older friends and relatives. In fact, many younger users are &quot;pruning&quot; their accounts to remove some of the casual student acquaintances they've added to focus on their more meaningful connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Colin. I think you make some terrific points. In addition clutter and increased competition, the demographic shift has done a lot to temper advocacy in Facebook.</p>
<p>As you indicated, Facebook is an increasingly congested and competitive space. For some users, the novelty of adding more causes or fan applications is over, and even the first movers are suffering a lack of stickiness. Creating buzz is a lot easier that creating regular participation.</p>
<p>There has also been a big demographic shift since FB flung open its doors. The average user is older (about 30) and as a whole the environment is less fertile for advocacy. The first class of Facebook users graduated college and expanded their friend-base to include older individuals. Their online Facebook experience now mirrors their offline one &#8212; they&#8217;ve left the student-only groups and integrated with society at large.</p>
<p>As important as advocacy is to many Facebook users, that&#8217;s not the primary reason that most use the service. While the promise of Facebook is far deeper engagement, it requires even more nurturing than the 1-way channels of DM or email, and this is harder to do in a crowded, older (possibly more apathetic) arena.</p>
<p>Most of the work (and most of the donations) in any organization come from a very, very small percentage of the total body. If you can find those people on Facebook, they&#8217;re lieutenants that can help you build an active community.</p>
<p>As far as Facebook&#8217;s overall health, it&#8217;s taken some hits but I still believe it&#8217;s as strong as ever &#8212; at the very least there is no better alternative for mass adoption (OpenSocial may change that). The original users still complain about clutter, but many do enjoy using the tool to connect with older friends and relatives. In fact, many younger users are &#8220;pruning&#8221; their accounts to remove some of the casual student acquaintances they&#8217;ve added to focus on their more meaningful connections.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Rovner</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-290109</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2008/05/04/has-facebook-jumped-the-shark-as-a-political-tool/#comment-290109</guid>
					<description>First of all I love your blog.  Keep it coming.  And I hope people will read your jump the shark post bc it has an outstanding summary of key elements for a social networking strategy.

My two cents is that you can't jump the shark until you have &quot;arrived.&quot; Fonzie's epic jump (whence comes the expression) would not have mattered if no one ever watched Happy Days.  I wonder if what we are witnessing instead with regard to Facebook is the popping of the &quot;balloon of unrealistic expectations.&quot;


This is not an original perception but I subscribe to the view that Facebook is more of a mirror of what (and who) is on people's minds and in their hearts, rather than some kind of tool that can wielded like a sword.  Yes we can goose a few extra people into joining our list by having [big airquotes here] &quot;best practices,&quot; but we can't make something happen whose time has not come.  Conversely, when its time comes, when an issue is ripe, you're gonna look like a genius because the world will beat a path to your door and all you'll have to is keep the lights on.


I love Facebook.  I play scrabble.  I hang out with my dive buddies.  I get to &quot;remember&quot; friends' and colleagues' birthdays.  And occasionally I join a group or take an action.  Other than being old for a Facebook user, I am guessing I am more or less typical  in that most users do not live, breathe and dream their cause.  That's the mirror part -- the world, even the part that really cares -- has a life and Facebook is helping many of them live it.

It's way too early to give up on Facebook.  Jump the shark?  I don't think it has even gotten in the water...


Thanks Colin for giving me an excuse to put off writing the proposal I have been procrastinating on all weekend!  (-8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all I love your blog.  Keep it coming.  And I hope people will read your jump the shark post bc it has an outstanding summary of key elements for a social networking strategy.</p>
<p>My two cents is that you can&#8217;t jump the shark until you have &#8220;arrived.&#8221; Fonzie&#8217;s epic jump (whence comes the expression) would not have mattered if no one ever watched Happy Days.  I wonder if what we are witnessing instead with regard to Facebook is the popping of the &#8220;balloon of unrealistic expectations.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not an original perception but I subscribe to the view that Facebook is more of a mirror of what (and who) is on people&#8217;s minds and in their hearts, rather than some kind of tool that can wielded like a sword.  Yes we can goose a few extra people into joining our list by having [big airquotes here] &#8220;best practices,&#8221; but we can&#8217;t make something happen whose time has not come.  Conversely, when its time comes, when an issue is ripe, you&#8217;re gonna look like a genius because the world will beat a path to your door and all you&#8217;ll have to is keep the lights on.</p>
<p>I love Facebook.  I play scrabble.  I hang out with my dive buddies.  I get to &#8220;remember&#8221; friends&#8217; and colleagues&#8217; birthdays.  And occasionally I join a group or take an action.  Other than being old for a Facebook user, I am guessing I am more or less typical  in that most users do not live, breathe and dream their cause.  That&#8217;s the mirror part &#8212; the world, even the part that really cares &#8212; has a life and Facebook is helping many of them live it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s way too early to give up on Facebook.  Jump the shark?  I don&#8217;t think it has even gotten in the water&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks Colin for giving me an excuse to put off writing the proposal I have been procrastinating on all weekend!  (-8
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
