<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Presidential Debates: Evolutionary, Revolutionary or Painfully Boring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2007/05/08/online-presidential-debates-evolutionary-revolutionary-or-painfully-boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/05/08/online-presidential-debates-evolutionary-revolutionary-or-painfully-boring/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kira</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/05/08/online-presidential-debates-evolutionary-revolutionary-or-painfully-boring/#comment-70949</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 19:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/05/08/online-presidential-debates-evolutionary-revolutionary-or-painfully-boring/#comment-70949</guid>
		<description>For long, lecture-like videos, I tend to leave them on in the background and listen to it like radio. I don&#039;t imagine that&#039;s radically atypical behavior. So if the producers and candidate handlers treat online debates more like a radio show, it could still be interesting content. 

That is, assuming you&#039;re interested in what the candidates have to say to start with. Could be more compelling to do more subject-specfic debates, so people particularly interested in health care or whatever can tune in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For long, lecture-like videos, I tend to leave them on in the background and listen to it like radio. I don&#8217;t imagine that&#8217;s radically atypical behavior. So if the producers and candidate handlers treat online debates more like a radio show, it could still be interesting content. </p>
<p>That is, assuming you&#8217;re interested in what the candidates have to say to start with. Could be more compelling to do more subject-specfic debates, so people particularly interested in health care or whatever can tune in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

