<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less Than A Month Until Politics Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Sarabia</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/#comment-76395</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Sarabia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/#comment-76395</guid>
		<description>Bloggers tend to be people of words, thoughts and words, often logical thoughts and words.
But, they ignore that we are fighting AlQuida in Iraq, but ben Laden is in Tora Bora, Northern Pakistan.
They ignore that we have lost 3,400 soldiers and UBL lost less than 34.  That we have poured $500 Billion in Iraq and UBL has used, at most, $500,000.
That we have gone in debt for $2 or more Trillion and, probably, UBL would be happy to lend us more money.
That we have lost our raputation and friends in most of the world and we are only prolonging the agony of defeat.
What are we thinking? ARE we thinking?
We seem to follow a plan written by UBL himself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggers tend to be people of words, thoughts and words, often logical thoughts and words.<br />
But, they ignore that we are fighting AlQuida in Iraq, but ben Laden is in Tora Bora, Northern Pakistan.<br />
They ignore that we have lost 3,400 soldiers and UBL lost less than 34.  That we have poured $500 Billion in Iraq and UBL has used, at most, $500,000.<br />
That we have gone in debt for $2 or more Trillion and, probably, UBL would be happy to lend us more money.<br />
That we have lost our raputation and friends in most of the world and we are only prolonging the agony of defeat.<br />
What are we thinking? ARE we thinking?<br />
We seem to follow a plan written by UBL himself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Sarabia</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/#comment-57300</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Sarabia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/20/less-than-a-month-until-politics-online/#comment-57300</guid>
		<description>I worked with Artificial Intelligence 19 years ago. I am very disappointed there are no AI response systems to answer an email, whenever possible, anyone interested on the political views of a candidate. email is the ideal medium to interface with AI with the views of a candidate. There are collections of written papers written by or for the candidates that would provide answers tailored to the exact, or nearly exact, style or mood of the writer. Yahoo, for example has compiled a library of statements of a candidate that can be used by any voter. Google has a marvelous search engine and Wikipedia may have the best, if it is ever implemented as once intended.  The author of the email query provides the words and AI avoids giving dumb answers. Stanford and Lockheed Missile and Space Co., Sunnyvale had an excellent staff, but we have all retired. It can be done and it is an ideal fit for AI. Try it, you'd like it! As, they used to say. American Express used AI.
MikeSar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked with Artificial Intelligence 19 years ago. I am very disappointed there are no AI response systems to answer an email, whenever possible, anyone interested on the political views of a candidate. email is the ideal medium to interface with AI with the views of a candidate. There are collections of written papers written by or for the candidates that would provide answers tailored to the exact, or nearly exact, style or mood of the writer. Yahoo, for example has compiled a library of statements of a candidate that can be used by any voter. Google has a marvelous search engine and Wikipedia may have the best, if it is ever implemented as once intended.  The author of the email query provides the words and AI avoids giving dumb answers. Stanford and Lockheed Missile and Space Co., Sunnyvale had an excellent staff, but we have all retired. It can be done and it is an ideal fit for AI. Try it, you&#8217;d like it! As, they used to say. American Express used AI.<br />
MikeSar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
