<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watching the Watchers: Looking at the Unprecedented Scrutiny of Presidential Campaign Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-35261</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-35261</guid>
		<description>Hey - it is fun to evaluate                                             better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; it is fun to evaluate                                             better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Quick Hits &#8212; February 22, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-32306</link>
		<dc:creator>e.politics: online advocacy tools &#38; tactics &#187; Quick Hits &#8212; February 22, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-32306</guid>
		<description>[...] Campaign Site Design Review: Obama for President. Another solid contribution to the current online political obsession. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Campaign Site Design Review: Obama for President. Another solid contribution to the current online political obsession. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zeigler</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-31398</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zeigler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epolitics.com/2007/02/19/watching-the-watchers-looking-at-the-unprecedented-scrutiny-of-presidential-campaign-websites/#comment-31398</guid>
		<description>So I guess I should skip the 2,500 word breakdown of the font choices on Duncan Hunter&#039;s new site, huh?  Party pooper.

&lt;i&gt;Excess in defense of proper typography is no vice -- cpd&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess I should skip the 2,500 word breakdown of the font choices on Duncan Hunter&#8217;s new site, huh?  Party pooper.</p>
<p><i>Excess in defense of proper typography is no vice &#8212; cpd</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

