<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Tactics: Spreading the Word/Building an Audience</title>
	<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/online-tactics-spreading-the-word/</link>
	<description>dissecting the craft of online politics and online advocacy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/online-tactics-spreading-the-word/#comment-76931</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/online-tactics-spreading-the-word/#comment-76931</guid>
					<description>I have noticed a suspicious trend in some community blogs and my space with people claiming to have &quot;come across&quot; an article or to have &quot;recently been hearing about&quot; some candidtae or issue and &quot;not sure what to think about it&quot; and wondering what other people's thoughts are on this&quot;.  Without my paranoid quotes it would seem a perfectly reasonable posting, but when people respond they spend their time debunking arguments and deleting contradictory responses and recruiting like-minded people to visit a site or join an offline conversation.  Is this a new commonly used, albeit creepy, tactic or am I just reading too much into this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed a suspicious trend in some community blogs and my space with people claiming to have &#8220;come across&#8221; an article or to have &#8220;recently been hearing about&#8221; some candidtae or issue and &#8220;not sure what to think about it&#8221; and wondering what other people&#8217;s thoughts are on this&#8221;.  Without my paranoid quotes it would seem a perfectly reasonable posting, but when people respond they spend their time debunking arguments and deleting contradictory responses and recruiting like-minded people to visit a site or join an offline conversation.  Is this a new commonly used, albeit creepy, tactic or am I just reading too much into this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sally Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/online-tactics-spreading-the-word/#comment-26944</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.epolitics.com/2006/07/03/online-tactics-spreading-the-word/#comment-26944</guid>
					<description>I have been searching for reviews/comparisons of online software applications for local grassroots political organizations  of all in one suite website CMS, membership/donor management, and advocacy, etc.  I have found lots of bits of info here and there but no comprehensive source.  Any ideas?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been searching for reviews/comparisons of online software applications for local grassroots political organizations  of all in one suite website CMS, membership/donor management, and advocacy, etc.  I have found lots of bits of info here and there but no comprehensive source.  Any ideas?</p>
<p>Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
